Gutterballs
R1
DVD
TLA Releasing
This
edition of Gutterballs is the uncut “balls out” edition from TLA releasing and
it certainly is a shock to the system. This is a film where the slasher and rape-revenge
genre of the 1980’s meets the post modern violence of the “naughties”. It is
filled with excessive violence, gratuitous sex and rape and a lot more to shock
and offend. It is deliberately over the top, showing explicit sex, buckets and
buckets of gore and lots of very politically incorrect humour. The Raison
d'ętre of Gutterballs was to make a homage to the slasher and rape-revenge
films of the Eighties, ranging from Friday 13th to I Spit on your Grave. The
question is Does it work? This is hard to answer.
As
a cult film packed with excess it certainly packs a punch, you will not see
another film with as much explicit sex and violence as well as deliberately
skewed murder sex set pieces anywhere else. From oral sex gone horribly wrong
to a transsexual given her sex change by force, it certainly pushes the limits.
A
brief synopsis will give you some feel for the film. Two bowling teams converge
on an Xcalibur, a bowling alley to have a game; however they take their sport
very seriously. One team is filled with foul-mouthed sexist, homophobic inbred
morons. The other team is a group of “outsiders” including all manner of punks,
slutty woman, gays and cross dressers. This allows the filmmakers to indulge in
all manner of obnoxious dialogue and off-colour humour, the problem is that the
humour runs out very quickly and the film becomes vicious, very vicious.
After
a violent clash over the game, the morons steal one of the girl’s handbags and
use it to lure her back to the game room and rape her. This scene is especially
troublesome. It is explicit, extremely violent and way too extended – eight
minutes for a rape scene seems to go on forever. While this is meant to be a
homage to rape-revenge films, it goes way beyond what is necessary. There is a
gratuitous focus on the rape which is uncomfortable and even seems to delight
in what it shows. Personally I have little trouble with the sex and penetration
shown in other sections of the film, but the rape scene and some of the
prejudicial killings (such as the murder of the cross dresser/transperson)
seems to be nasty and vicious rather than amusing. This is a comedy film, which
loses its humour quickly and becomes rather spiteful.
Anyway,
as the morons return to the bowling alley, both parties are locked in and a
killer (known only as BBK) starts knocking them all off. He not only kills the
rapists but the other team as well, since the rape it seems all bets are off
and everybody is fair game.
Gutterballs
is controversial and shocking, it is a love letter to extreme cinema and on one
level works exceptionally well. At the same time Gutterballs seems to
illustrate a trend in recent “indie” films, a deliberate exaggeration of
violence and sex to “make a name”. It is as though they feel that if they shock,
stun, horrify and offend their audience they will be remembered forever and
this is the best way to succeed in the film industry.
It
is not that I did not find Gutterballs entertaining; it is that it is
deliberately skewed to offend. The rape scene is extended, the killer attacks
everyone (not just the rapists) and the killings are deliberately offensive
including what could be perceived as rather nasty attacks on sexual minorities.
The explicit sex doesn’t especially worry me even thought it doesn’t add a lot
to the film, except perhaps a bit of spice !
Ultimately
Gutterballs, especially the balls out uncut edition, is a film that the viewer
will need to make their own decision on. It has a lot going for it yet at the
same time seems to “cut its own throat” by not having a good editor look over
the script and tighten the plot. Sometimes less is more and you can make a more
powerful film by inference rather than showing every last second of a scene.
I
have thought a lot about Gutterballs and recommend it as an in your face horror
cult film experience, however, just remember, in regards to content, you have
been warned.
![]()
This review will appear in Volume 2 No.2
(2009) of the digital and print edition of Synergy Magazine.
If you came to this page directly (and
missed our menu), click here
to go to the Synergy Magazine front page. (http://www.synergy-magazine.com)