We Live in Public

Dogwoof Pictures

R2

 

Too often films on the Internet and technology only come in two flavours. There are the doomsayers who constantly warn us of the internet sex predators, addiction to computer games and cybercrime and the internet prophets who sell us a bright new world where all of mankind will be linked in a glowing web of collective Bliss. We Live in Public offers a surprisingly nuanced view of the development of the world of the Web through the life of Josh Harris. Harris is not someone who automatically comes to mind when you talk about the big wheelers and dealers of the computer world. He is not a Bill Gates or Steve Jobs, yet in the 1980’s he was a pioneer of online networks. Before the internet even became popular, Harris had formed Jupiter Communications which produced reports on new and developing technology and created chat rooms for Prodigy, which he later sold back to them for a tidy profit. As the internet took off and dot.com businesses became the flavour of the day, Harris became one of the “nerd gods” of the period founding Pseudo.com. Pseudo was the first internet TV network, it offered live TV channels combined with interactive chat rooms. The problem, however, was that it was way before it’s time, a difficulty Harris would have over and over again. Pseudo was offering live TV in a period before broadband and hence the transmission was painfully slow and while it was a great idea the bandwidth required to make it work was just not there.

 

As we explore the exciting world of Pseudo, Harris also offers interesting insights into the effects of television and then the internet on our lives. He notes how the children of the Sixties and Seventies, including himself, found their families in television rather than home life and hence the virtual world of entertainment was more real to them than the physical one. This experience was later transferred to the internet where socializing is done via social networks and online personas or avatars are the masks of choice.

 

Harris, however, always innovative, deciding to take his “avatar” a little further and developed Luvvy, a strange and disquieting clown persona which he began to use to entertain his friends. Soon it became an obsession and he wore his “clown drag” to business meetings and in public. This obviously did not go down well with the business world and media and he left Pseudo in 1999.

 

His next project Quiet: We Live in Public was even more controversial. In the centre of Manhattan he created an underground bunker to house a “Big Brother” like experiment in the form of the Quiet colony. Some eighty people were housed in pods and offered everything they would need; food, entertainment, a shooting range, alcohol and a dance club. At the same time every aspect of their life would be filmed and documented. They would literally eat, drink, have sex and go to the toilet in public and would have to agree not to leave the underground community. To up the ante he hired psychiatrists to interrogate the inhabitants of the colony on every aspect of their private lives. These interrogations became more and more invasive and what at first seemed like a media experiment seemed to be spiralling out of control.

 

The experiment moved from Anarchy to violence and freedom began to turn to aggression. Many felt it was becoming too much like a strange cult and early in 2000 the police raided believing it was some sort of doomsday sect connected to the end of the millennium. Many believed the raid was just in time before many of the occupants would end up permanently psychologically damaged. Others heralded it as major media and radical lifestyle experience. The answer is probably somewhere in-between. Harris was certainly making a name for himself.

 

Following Quiet, he went away on holiday, fell in love with Tanya and developed his first (and only) intimate relationship. Together they embarked on the next “Live in Public” experiment. They moved in together and turned their whole lives into an internet experience. Cameras and microphones where placed throughout their unit and filmed every aspect of their lives, feedback constantly streamed in via chat rooms set up for the purpose on their website. While it went well for the first few months slowly their relationship disintegrated under the pressure of living in the public light. Tanya left and when the dot.com crash took caused a 55% fall in the tech market the project collapsed leaving Josh with little to no cash.

 

In 2003 he was running an apple farm having lost his fortune and having no meaningful relationships, having isolated himself from both family and friends. He communicated via video tape and lived with his animals and apples. Strangely Harris seems to be a person who has little connection with reality having grown up in his own virtual world, in the form of both television and the internet. He has rewritten his life he way he wants to see it including redefining his relationship with Tanya as a pseudo-relationship for “Live in Public” experiment only.

 

Of course Harris couldn’t keep himself out of the world of technology for long and in 2005 he sold his farm and opened Operator 11. Operator 11 was a unique internet based site in which a user could “create their own television show”; it was creative and innovative but once again way before its time. When Harris tried to get investment no one wanted to touch him due to his past media “experiments” and none of the current crop of media moguls wanted in, it crashed into a heap.

 

In 2008 Harris resurfaces in Ethiopia working with Orphans and coincidentally escaping his creditors. While he may have chosen humans over technology for now, considering his career so far one may wonder whether this is just another stage in his strange media managed life.

 

Josh Harris seems to have a unique problem. He is always ahead of the trend, way ahead. The ramifications of each trend are insignificant in Harris’ eyes, he knows they are coming and simply explores them in his own unique, some would say, bizarre way.

 

The impressive aspect of this documentary is that it doesn’t pontificate; it provides insight into the many aspects of the effects of media and the internet on our lives through the lens of the business experiments of Josh Harris. We Live in Public is a challenging and thought provoking documentary. It avoids sensationalism, even though covering some truly wild and outrageous territory. It will stimulate much debate about all manner of subjects from the effects of media to privacy, celebrity and fame to the personal cost of a life lived in the spotlight.

 

 

vatribflorish

 

 

Reviews appear on the Synergy website with a single cover image. In the digital and print edition, reviews appear with multiple images and with expanded content. We recommend you download the free digital edition (or buy the print edition) to get the most from Synergy Magazine.

 

This review will appear in Volume 3 No.2 of the digital and print edition of Synergy Magazine.

 

If you came to this page directly (and missed our menu), click here to go to the front page of Synergy Magazine Website or use the following link:  http://www.synergy-magazine.com