WW1 – The War To End All Wars
2008
Creation Films
Reel DVD
R4 DVD
Reviewer: Bob Estreich
Opinions differ about the value of this
sort of documentary. One side looks at them as “armchair history”, not always
well researched and often based more on available film footage than the
relative importance of t he events being discussed. The other side (and I
confess I am one of this group) does not have the time, expertise or references
to explore the subjects in a more scholarly manner. DVDs like this set fill the
gap and provide sufficient information to raise interest and maybe inspire the
viewer to do a little more research of their own.
So how does this 3-DVD set measure up? It
covers the build-up to the war, the political situation that caused it, the
countries that were involved and the outcomes. The set has its weaknesses but
we will look at those later. Its main strength is that it has enough capacity
in 3 DVDs to explore the subject in a thorough manner.
There are hints that some of it has been
taken from earlier shows. The interviews look around twenty years old or so and
much of the action footage has been used before. It has been carefully
assembled into a set of chapters that cover the progress of the war.
With Flags
Waving
This chapter is the best and clearest
explanation to the political lead up to WW1 that I have seen. It starts with
the growth in the strength of a combined Germany from Bismarck’s time, and its
attempts to marginalise its chief opposition on the continent, France. The
complex web of alliances and treaties that eventually involved all countries in
the war is explained well.
The Battle Of
The Frontiers
The critical location of Belgium as a way
around the fortifications of the German-French frontiers put it in danger from
both the Germans and the French.
Belgium’s refusal to allow foreign troops to cross its borders led to
its invasion. Both the French and the Germans simply ignored the little nation
in their rush to get at each others’ throats. The valiant Belgian defence of
Liege was to be one of their few battles.. The Germans took high casualties as
they faced the well prepared and entrenched Belgians, but the result was really
never in doubt. The Germans had a new ground-penetrating shell that wrecked the
walls and structures and allowed the German troops to take the Belgian forts.
In the face of superior German firepower the old fort system was now found to
be outdated
France was not so easy. Although the
German howitzers were superior against forts, the French had better field
artillery in their 75mm fast-firing field gun. Unfortunately the French troops
were inexperienced and otherwise less well equipped. They fell back in the face
of the sheer numbers of the Germans. Along the border the balance seesawed. Von
Moltke, the German leader, was less effective and indecisive. Joffre, the
French commander, was overconfident and had ineffectual intelligence.
For a change the British got it right. Sir
John French’s British Expeditionary Force was at the right place at the right
time, well supplied and well prepared. At Mons they were directly facing the
bulk of the German army sweeping down through Belgium. Aerial reconnaissance
soon made the French aware of this, but Sir John was unaware of its importance
and had contra intelligence that he preferred to believe. He dug in at Mons.
Along the front the other countries did the same and the stage was set for the
horrors of trench warfare. Interviews and quotes describe emotionally the dreadful
experience of being underneath an accurate German heavy bombardment.
The Taxis of
the Marne
This chapter discusses the French defence
of their territory. It would take time to train and equip more men and gear up
their industry to a wartime footing. The battle now was for supplies for the
trench troops. Shells were rationed. Winter required warmer clothing, heating
and constant clearing of roads and trenches. Any fighting soon became bogged
down in the snow and the fight became one of artillery duels.
A War of
Chemicals and Engineering
Chlorine gas was introduced at Ypres on an
experimental basis. It caused a mass retreat of the affected French soldiers
and opened up a five mile gap in the front.
In the East the Russians Czarist troops
were forcing the Austro-Hungarians back. The Germans took troops from the
Eastern front and reinforced the Austrians. The Russians argued over priorities
– keep attacking the Austro-Hungarians or concentrate on Germany? It was
decided to keep attacking Germany, but Germany was better organized and
industrialized. They wiped out much of the Russian army attacking Prussia. In
the south, however, the Russians captured more than 100,000 Austrians. With
plenty of shells and led once again by their powerful howitzer guns, the
Austrian-German counterattack succeeded and the Russians were forced to
withdraw to the Vistula river. The Czar ignored the rising dissatisfaction
among his troops and the people.
When Germany and Bulgaria attacked Serbia,
the King of Greece refused permission for the allies to land supporting troops
and march them through Greece. Serbia’s future was short.
On the Western front the Germans
introduced flamethrowers. Losses in trench-based battles were now being counted
in the hundreds of thousands.
Flyboys
Aerial warfare was a new development.
There were significant intelligence gains from aerial reconnaissance and the
military leaders to begin to take it seriously. Photography was a major
development but the need to fly low and straight made the aircraft good targets
for ground troops. Early bombing was developed. Both sides were aware of the
difference reconnaissance and bombing could make to a battle and it was
inevitable that aircraft would be built to shoot down the other side’s
aircraft. This facet of the war has been better covered in the series Four
Years of Thunder, but the coverage in this documentary is quite adequate.
Another little-covered area, German
airships, is also explored. For a while they terrorised Londoners at night but
they were vulnerable over the battlefield and could not carry a significant
bombload. They had a brief use as a night bomber but the development of the
night fighter made them a very dangerous proposition. They fell out of use,
replaced by the twin engined Gotha bomber.
Citadel
With the Central Powers now fighting on
several fronts it was imperative to Germany that at least one of the fronts
should be neutralized by a major military strike. Falkenheim, the German
commander, believed the French army was at its lowest point and represented the
best chance of success. If he could force France into submission it would make
it difficult for the other allies to continue fighting on the Western Front. He
saw Britain as his main enemy but could only step up submarine warfare against
their supply lines. He proposed to stage a feint attack against the French
troops at Verdun, forcing the French to counterattack. His well protected
troops would destroy the French troops and weaken their military power.
Rather than destroying the French in a
counterattack, the initial German attack was quite successful in itself. The
Germans halted within five miles of Verdun. At this point Petain was put in
charge of the French defenses and readied a counterattack, as Falkenheim had
anticipated. Not as planned, though, was the need for the Germans to attack the
French guns which had the Germans pinned down on the other side of the river.
Attack after attack was driven back and was immediately followed by a French
counterattack. It was the Germans who were being decimated in the battle.
Joffre was not satisfied with this and replaced Petain with a more aggressive
commander who had been nicknamed “the Butcher” because of his contempt for the
lives of his men. Repeated attacks destroyed the reserves on both sides.
Finally Falkenheim was directed to fight a defensive posture only. He was then
replaced. In the final outcome both the German and French armies had lost out
and neither fully recovered before the end of the war.
Distant Fronts
The same need to open a new front to
increase pressure on Germany and its allies was recognised by the British. The
Dardanelles looked like a good prospect to Churchill as this would open up the
Black Sea for supplies to Russia. The key point was the Gallipoli peninsula in
Turkey. 70,000 men were raised for the invasion – Australian, British, New
Zealanders and French. Naval bombardments of the Turkish defences were
dangerous as the Straits were sown with mines and the Turkish gunners were
better than anticipated. Turkey also realized the importance of Gallipoli and
strengthened the peninsula, while the British sorted out their supply problems
in Egypt.
The landings were poorly managed. Where
troops did get ashore they failed to press inland. The Australian and New
Zealand troops (abbreviated to ANZAC) were pinned down at what became known as
Anzac Cove. They were facing a very able Turkish commander, Mustafa Kemal.
Occasional savage hand to hand fighting in brief raids became the standard of
battle as the campaign bogged down. A new landing at Suvla Bay was also a
failure when the troops again failed to move inland. Finally the attack was
doomed a failure and the troops were evacuated.
Sea battles between the blockading British
ships against the German Imperial Fleet were eagerly sought to establish
control of the northern oceans. .The Kaiser was reluctant to send his prized
navy to sea to face a possible battle loss. This chapter has a good analysis of the relative strengths
and weaknesses of the two fleets, including their air support. The fleets
finally met off Jutland but the battle was indecisive. The British lost more
ships, but the Germans retreated to their ports and stayed there for the
duration of the war.
Nationalist Arabs were concerned that the
failing Ottoman Empire would not give them their freedom, so they allied
themselves with Britain and France against the Turks. T E Lawrence was sent to
help them build their own fighting force. The small force raised havoc,
particularly with the railway system. They successfully tied down many Turkish
troops and eventually controlled large amounts of territory in the eastern
Mediterranean. The Ottomans tried to capture the critical Suez Canal. Two
successive attacks failed, but many British troops were in their turn tied down
in the area. General Allenby was ordered to take Jerusalem. An Australian
cavalry charge took Beersheba and broke the Ottoman defensive line, allowing
them to move further and take Gaza. Gradually the allies moved up the coast
until Jerusalem was finally taken. Further attacks drove the Turkish troops out
of Palestine and the Turkish Government signed an Armistice, then surrendered.
Revolt
With the Russians believed to be incapable
of launching a major assault in the west, German troops were moved to reinforce
the eastern Front. The Russians saw their chance and attempted a massive attack
to split the Germans and Austrians. At first it succeeded, but as
reinforcements rushed back and the actions in the German part of the front
petered out, the Russians were forced to retreat.
The constant losses, the poor conditions
and the inept running of the war by the Czar were causing serious unrest in
Russia. The 1916-1917 winter saw starvation and food shortages in Russian
cities. Demonstrations began calling for a change of government. The Czar
ordered his troops to shoot the mobs who were demonstrating. The troops
refused. Petrograd fell into the hands of the revolutionaries. Gradually the
army began electing its own officers and ignoring the overall command of the
Czar. Revolutionaries began touring the battlefronts stirring up the
soldiers.
The French army also had problems. By
October 1917 more than 250 mutinies had occurred. The long-pressed troops were
on the verge of revolt, and refused to take part in the suicidal frontal
assaults still favoured by their commanders. Petain was trusted by the troops and was brought
back to regain control, but over 500 soldiers were executed for mutiny. At
least they managed to get the doctrine of “victory at all costs” revoked.
Another effect was that the British and Dominion forces took a greater share of
the fighting.
In Russia Lenin’s Bolsheviks finally
staged a coup that toppled the government. They then set out to organise an
Armistice with the Germans. The armistice cost Russia a third of its
agricultural land and much of its population. Germany gained thousands of free
troops to send to the Western front.
To relieve pressure on the French and deny
Belgian ports to the German U-boats, Haig was ordered to launch an attack into
Belgium. It was to be another “attack at all cost” assault so beloved by the
homicidal Haig. Despite their inferior artillery, faulty shells, and rainy
conditions that made tanks unusable the attack continued and predictably bogged
down. The reinforced, well dug in Germans also used a new weapon – mustard gas.
The horror of Passchendaele began. Over three months of fighting, half a
million soldiers died.
Finally at Cambrai the British got it
together. They organized their tanks in massed groups, working over ground that
had not been churned into mud by preliminary shelling. Tank and infantry
cooperation were essential. Air support was laid on. Unfortunately the advance
faltered and eventually the British withdrew back to their previous lines,
wasting thousands of lives in the process.
Changing Tide
This chapter explores the political
situation in the United States. There was some British sympathy and some
distrust of Germany, but no overwhelming will to fight. This attitude changed with
the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915 by a submarine. Many Americans lost their
lives. President Wilson was forced to respond and threatened to break off
diplomatic relations with Germany. A German message urging Mexico to attack the
US, supported by Germany, was intercepted and the tide of public opinion swung.
Finally when US ships were sunk in a convoy, America joined the war. By June
1918 their troops were moving to Europe. This led to unrestricted submarine
warfare by the Germans in a desperate attempt to stop the flow of materiel and
men.
The U-boat war and its increasing
effectiveness is described in detail. The convoy system was developed as a
defence against submarines. Depth charges started to have successes.
Austrians, supplemented by German troops,
attacked Italy at Caporetto. The primary attack was highly successful but the
subsidiary attacks were held off. Allied aid now flowed to Italy, and
eventually the Italians broke the demoralized Austrian forces. Further aid to
the area led to Serbia being liberated and Bulgaria pulling out of the war.
Germany’s allies were gradually dropping out as the war contracted.
End Game
The leaders of the German forces were
coming to the view that they must stage a huge decisive battle to break the
allies, or capitulate. The battle was set for north-eastern France along a huge
front, and over a million German troops participated. Allied troops were
seriously outnumbered and were forced back. The allies regrouped and by early
April 1918 it was obvious that the huge attack had failed. The Germans were now
low on manpower and supplies and facing the fresh American troops. French
counterattacks pushed the Germans back towards the Rhine and U.S.
reinforcements were brought in to support the French.
In Russia the fall of the Czar led to a
number of areas like Finland defecting and becoming independent. Internal
problems – the hatred and disorganization between the Reds and Whites - led
them to look inwards and other countries took advantage to capture Russian
territory from the Germans for themselves.
In Germany the army was becoming
increasingly unhappy with its leadership. Its army’s strength had now fallen by
twenty percent. Small groups of soldiers were surrendering to the allies rather
than keep fighting. When the Austrians advised Germany that they would arrange
a separate peace, Prince Wilhelm finally realized that the war must finish. A
new German government was formed, which contacted the allies to arrange an
armistice. Ludendorff, head of the army, was in favour of fighting on to the
last man but was forced to resign. Wilhelm’s wish for a last gesture sea battle
as a matter of honour brought the navy to mutiny. The revolt quickly spread to
the rest of the navy, then to the workers.
On November 8 the armistice was signed –
by the civilian government. Not a single German officer signed. Perhaps the
most disappointed was the American general Pershing who wanted to carry the
fight into Germany, reasoning that the Germans must know they had been beaten.
Now let’s look at the weaknesses.
As you would expect from such a massive
documentary some of the footage is reused in a number of sections, but the
amount of newer footage and the use of stills is outstanding.
There are few interviews and they are not
used for padding but to illustrate a point. As noted, they seem to be from
older documentaries but this is understandable – there are few survivors of the
war left. Often their written words are voiced and the American accent creeps
in to some of these. The U.S. pronunciations are a little strange –
“admirality” for “Admiralty” is a regular and grating example.
I would like to have seen an attempt to
clean up some of the footage. The technology exists, but not using it gives
parts of the series a rather low-budget look.
The background music is mostly classical
and is a bit sporadic about how well it fits the context. The music played
during the credits is dreadfully out of place – Dixieland jazz is simply not
appropriate for such a grim subject.
Comparisons with The World At War,
the magnificent series covering World War 2, are unavoidable. Although The
World At War seems much better produced, this series because of its detailed
and thorough content seems to me to be quite a good effort. I especially make
allowances for the time differences – The World At War was made about thirty
years after the event, while many of the participants were still living and
there was much more film footage available. This set covers a war thirty years
older again. Overall it’s a good job of a complex subject and I commend it to
you.
![]()
Reviews
appear on the Synergy website with a single cover image. In the digital and
print edition, reviews appear with multiple images and with expanded content.
We recommend you download the free digital edition
(or buy the print edition) to get the most from Synergy
Magazine.
This
review will appear in Volume 2 No.6
(2009) of the digital and print edition of Synergy Magazine.
If
you came to this page directly (and missed our menu), click here
to go to the front page of Synergy Magazine Website or click the following
link: http://www.synergy-magazine.com