Immigration Nation
SBS
Madman
R4 DVD
One
of the most shameful parts of Australian history is its treatment of non-white,
non-British immigrants. This is the subject of the documentary – attitudes,
politics and all. It is controversial but necessary and it will help
Australians to understand how the country started. Japan is sometimes
criticised for not telling its students the truth about World War II –
immigration policy seems to have been played down in Australia for probably the
same reasons.
The
White Australia policy was made law at Federation, although it was called the
Immigration Act. Its purpose was to make Australia a whites-only country along
the British model. There seems no valid reason for this policy at the time,
simply peoples’ prejudices against anyone different. I have heard a theory that
British were preferred because their immigrants were from the lower classes and
knew their place, posing no threat to the local “aristocracy”. It used the same
justifications as slavery in an earlier century and was just as hypocritical.
Non-British were actually called “the servile races”. The documentary would
have been better if it had included the reasons for these attitudes.
The
problem was that Australia already had a large number on non-whites. There were
Chinese from the gold mining days, Japanese pearlers, Pacific Islanders (known
as Kanakas) working in the canefields and, of course,
the troublesome Aborigines who simply refused to die out fast enough. The new
policy required that these people be deported and refused reentry.
The aborigines were not regarded as a problem as their numbers were falling and
the problem would eventually just go away. The policy was, in fact, what we now
call “ethnic cleansing”. This policy was to be applied particularly to Asians.
To enter the country as an immigrant the Government introduced the Dictation
Test. Immigrants had to be able to write down accurately a 50-word dictation.
If they showed aptitude the language could be changed to any language the
Immigration Officer selected. The Government’s hypocrisy was clearly evident to
them as they hid the White Australia policy behind this ludicrous test.
Families like the Chinese O”Hoys were forcibly broken
up when non-complying members were sent back to their country of origin.
After
World War I the policy was continued. Australia desperately needed men and
women to develop the nation, but they would have to be British. The British
government took the opportunity to unload their lower classes and unemployed
onto Australia with lies about ready-made farms and great opportunities.
Meanwhile at the post-war conferences the Japanese were repeatedly snubbed and
developed a dislike for Australia and its racist policy.
After
World War II the situation changed. Arthur Calwell, deputy leader of the Labour
Party and a dedicated White Australia man, knew Australia had to “populate or
perish”. No matter how they tried they could not get enough suitable British
immigrants. Calwell, a canny politician, knew Australians would not accept
opening the floodgates to just any immigrant. He sent staff to the Displaced
Persons camps throughout Europe signing up immigrants. Although not British
they were at least white. For the first boat he selected the most attractive
men and women and gave them great media coverage. The public fell for it. The
new buzzword was “assimilation”. There were still no Asians allowed, though.
The deportations continued. One of the saddest was the case of 5 year old Nancy
Prasad. She was being looked after by her naturalised brother but the Dept of Immigration insisted that she be deported back to
Fiji as she didn’t have Australian citizenship. A carefully organised publicity
stunt brought the deportation policy to the notice of the public via the new
medium of TV and many Australians started to wonder if this inhumane policy was
necessary.
The
situation changed again during the Vietnam war.
Eighteen year olds were being sent off to kill people although they were still
regarded as too immature to vote. The rising feeling against the war forced the
Government to act. They gave the young people the right to vote and at the next
election the ungrateful little bastards voted them out of office. The incoming
Labour government promised to ease the White Australia policy but Prime
Minister Gough Whitlam was slow to act, feeling that immigrants from Asia may
vote against his government. Then the boat people started to arrive.
Refugees
from Vietnam made their way through storms and pirates to Australia. Many were
in a piteous state when they arrived and public opinion continued to change.
After all, these people had been fighting alongside out troops in Vietnam.
Surely we owed them something? The last vestiges of support for the White
Australia policy now seemed to be entrenched mostly in the elderly, who could
parrot the catchphrases used to justify the policy without having to think too
hard about it. The politicians, however, were getting younger and their
influence was growing.
When
the Labour party was kicked out of government the case of Nancy Prasad was raised to
the new Prime Minister, Malcolm Fraser. Anxious to establish a good public
image and to claim his place in history, Fraser to his credit immediately
reversed the earlier decision and invited Nancy back to Australia. This
effectively marked the end of the White Australia policy but the old attitudes
died hard.
Australia
is now one of the most multiracial countries in the world. Each new ethnic
group has had its problems settling in but has eventually become Australian but
kept the traditions of its own culture. If nothing else our cuisine has
improved dramatically. Now a new group of refugees is arriving from Afghanistan
and Iran. Australia is still settling refugees from wartorn
African nations. The documentary is timely because the same old arguments
against ethnic immigration are being trotted out again. Some groups bring their
problems with them and it may take a generation or two to settle them down. I
would like to have seen these covered in the documentary, as they are the cause
of much of the opposition to immigration. Arthur Calwell’s point still stands,
though – we must populate or perish. The immigrants are the only answer.
![]()
Reviews appear on the Synergy website with
a single cover image. In the digital and print edition, reviews appear with
multiple images and with expanded content.
This review will appear in Volume 4 No. 2 of the digital and print
edition of Synergy.
We recommend you download
the free digital edition (or buy the print edition)
to get the most from Synergy. The print and digital editions of Synergy also
include a large selection of articles and features not found on the website. If
you have a limited download quota you can view the digital edition via the Issuu viewer on the digital edition page.
If you came to this page directly (and
missed our menu), click here to go to the
front page of Synergy Website or use the following link: http://www.synergy-magazine.com