Fuel
Blue Water Entertainment and Open
Pictures
Josh Tickell
Productions
Cinema Libre
Studio
This
is not just another doco about the evils of the oil industry. Promisingly, it
looks in depth at the alternatives to oil for the future. There are more than I
thought and producer Josh Tickell goes into more
detail on them than I have seen before.
The
story is really in four separate strands. There is the personal side. His
mother’s family lives along the stretch of the Louisiana bayou where there is
one of the world’s largest concentrations of oil refineries between Baton Rouge
and New Orleans. The air, water and ground are polluted and the cancer rate is
abnormally high. Josh’s family members have been dying from unusual causes for
many years, and it seems the fumes and pollution may also be affecting the
reproductive process of residents.
The
second strand is the political side – oil companies tied with Government is a
sure recipe for no change. Josh feels that people power will be the only way
that this combination can be broken. He quotes from Ghandi: “Where the people
lead, the leaders will follow”. Good luck, since there appears to be no
large-scale organised resistance to the oil lobby.
As
an alternative to this, though, Josh gives us examples of where individual
actions have had an effect. Las Vegas has one of the country’s biggest fleets
of school buses and they all now use biodiesel made from soy, maize or recycled
vegetable oil. There was no conversion cost – oil-based diesel and biodiesel
are completely compatible. Many truck drivers are now convinced of the value of
biodiesel and change over to it whenever it is available. I was interested to
find that Rudolf Diesel’s original engine was designed to run on peanut oil.
Unfortunately the move to biodiesel was undermined by discussions on the cost
of growing crops for fuel rather than for food. Josh points out that the U.S.
needs cheap food to export in exchange for imported oil.
The
third strand is the alternatives currently available. Many green movements are
dedicated to solar as the only future power source, and it has its advantages.
The cost of making and setting up solar plants is high, though, and solar
energy is not really suitable for transport use unless converted and stored as
electricity. This adds
further to the cost. He looks at alternatives that can use the
existing infrastructure. For transport, he feels that a return to biodiesel is
the way of the future. Apart from recycled vegetable oil he looks at companies
that are producing biodiesel from algae beds – the original way that the oil
reserves were formed. Experiments suggest that oil can be harvested from algae
in as little as three days. The algae need warm water, carbon dioxide and
sunlight – conditions that exist already at many power stations. Is it possible
that a power station could become almost self-sufficient in its own fuel
production? I have not seen this proposition discussed before.
Apart
from algae, biomass (trees, vegetable waste) can also be processed into fuels.
Scientists are developing a Megaflora tree that
reaches maturity in three years and could provide the needed amount of biomass
quickly and cheaply. It also has the advantage that it can be grown in marginal
lands and can actually improve the soil by removing toxic components. It will
not require croplands to be converted to oil crops and it is comparatively low
cost because the tree regenerates from its own stump, eliminating the need for
costly replanting..
In
the fourth strand Josh looks at ways of making our cities more self-sufficient,
not only by energy saving but by such logical moves as growing food in the
cities to avoid the transport costs. We see an example of a futuristic
“vertical farm” that could use a footprint of one city block to produce
significant amounts of food such as fruit and vegetables. The usual
alternatives like solar and biodiesel are looked at but Josh examines them in
the far more intelligent context of being just a part of the total solution. It
is this rational mixed approach to the technologies that I find makes the
documentary so much more credible.
There
are negatives in the documentary. There are the usual figures given out without
a source to back them up, he is coy about the capital cost of setting up the
new technologies, and he relies a lot on people power ( a notoriously
short-span thing) to make the political changes necessary. Apart from these,
though, I think he is on the right track.
![]()
Reviews appear on the Synergy website with
a single cover image. In the digital and print edition, reviews appear with
multiple images and with expanded content.
This review will appear in Volume 3 No. 5 of the digital and print
edition of Synergy.
We recommend you download
the free digital edition (or buy the print edition)
to get the most from Synergy. The print and digital editions of Synergy also
include a large selection of articles and features not found on the website. If
you have a limited download quota you can view the digital edition via the Issuu viewer on the digital edition page.
If you came to this page directly (and
missed our menu), click here to go to the
front page of Synergy Website or use the following link: http://www.synergy-magazine.com